Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> writes: > Can we treat this as a bugfix to be done during stage2? There is > already some support in mainline, but it performs lousy on anything but > the most simple of testccases. After much iterations with Richi, we > couldn't come to an agreement on the remaining fixes. I would like to > take another stab at this during stage2, if it is OK with Richi and > others.
No opinion on your actual question, but note that there is no more stage2. We now go directly from stage1 to stage3. This is just another feature of gcc development seemingly designed to confuse newbies, and evidently even confuses experienced developers. Ian
