On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote:
> Ulf Magnusson <ulfali...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there some reason why GCC couldn't generate this code for the first
>> version of C::f()? Is this a failure of optimization, or am I missing
>> something in how __restricted works?
>
> It's a failure of optimization.
>
> Ian
>

Is this something that has been improved in 4.6.x? (Sorry for the
initial non-reply-all.)

Reply via email to