Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > In particular, is transactional-memory branch mergeable within > a month and half, at least some parts of cxx-mem-model branch, > bitfield lowering? What is the status of lra, reload-2a, pph,
Torvald and I are looking into getting things merge read, but... The main problem seems to be that the TM community still hasn't formally submitted the C++ changes to the standards committee, and are still swinging between two alternate syntax implementations. So unless, this gets resolved in the next month, transactional memory will have to sit this one out. Torvald, is this a fair assessment?
