On 08/09/11 14:54, Diego Novillo wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 09:23, Richard Earnshaw <rearn...@arm.com> wrote: > >> And that's only going to work if all the test names are unique. I >> currently see quite a few tests that appear in my log as both PASS and >> FAIL in a single run. For example: > > That's fine. What we are looking for is to capture the state of > FAIL/UNRESOLVED/XPASS. Any change of state in those is an interesting > signal to investigate. > > >> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c -Os execution test >> PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/non-local-goto-2.c -Os execution test >> >> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c -Os execution test >> PASS: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/setjmp-3.c -Os execution test > > Sigh. We should really try to replace dejagnu. So much work, though. > > > Diego. >
It's not dejagnu specifically, it's just the names people have given to the tests. R.
