On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Vladimir Yakovlev <vbyakov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following test fails in linking if compiled with ffast-math and O0,
> but it compiled successfully with ffast-math and O2. Also no problem
> if -lm is added.
>
> $ cat t.c
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> float foo(float x)
> {
> float y = 0;
> while (x > 0.00000001) {
> y += x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x*x;
> x = x/2;
> }
> return y;
> }
>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> float y = atoi(argv[1]);
> printf("%f\n", foo(y));
> return 0;
> }
>
>
> $ gcc -ffast-math -O0 t.c
> /tmp/cccA1sUB.o: In function `foo':
> t.c:(.text+0x2c): undefined reference to `powf'
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> $ gcc -ffast-math -O2 t.c
> $ ./a.out 5
> 1220852096.000000
>
>
> FE with -ffast-math replaced x*x*...*x with __builtin_powf. Later with
> -O2 this call is replaced back into multiplications in sincos phase.
> The stability with -O0 is because sincos phase doesn't work on -O0.
>
> I think we must avoid doing this optimization in FE and turn off
> -ffast-math if -O0 is used. Your opinion.
No, I think we should avoid most of the builtin related folding at -O0.
Can you open a bugreport on gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla please?
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Vladimir
>
