On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Paulo J. Matos <pocma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have finally ported my backend to the latest 4.6.1 after years of trying > to play catch with the latest release version. > > I am now fixing some details. > > A source file has a function called: lm_change_to_active which, when > compiled with -Os is inlined. > When I compile it with -fno-inline-functions -fno-inline-small-functions, I > get a label for the function in the final assembler which looks like: > lm_change_to_active.isra?0?.constprop?1? > > Seems to be that GCC is adding .isra?0? and later .constprop?1? to the name > of the function as it goes. However, my assembler doesn't like the two dots > and the '?' in the middle of the label name very much. > > Have I forgotten to define a hook or how I can tell GCC how to create this > name?
See cgraph.c:clone_function_name, it uses the NO_DOT_IN_LABEL and NO_DOLLAR_IN_LABEL target macros and ASM_FORMAT_PRIVATE_NAME. I don't see where a '?' should enter this picture anywhere. Richard. > Cheers, > > -- > PMatos > >
