Well, the basic issue is that the "linkage name" is produced by
libiberty/cp-demangle.c and the DW_AT_name is produced by
gcc/cp/error.c, and they don't always agree on the same pretty-printed
representation of a C++ expression.
For this case,
The function linkage name has prefix: K<&(S::m(int))>
This isn't actually valid C++ syntax, so the demangler should be adjusted.
Or maybe it is not a bug and one just has to accept the function prefix may
not match its struct/class name?
This would also be a good idea, for robustness when this kind of issue
crops up.
Jason
