On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> wrote: > Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> writes: > >> My proposal would be: A patch may be reverted immediately by anyone >> with SVN write access if bootstrap is broken for more than 24 hours on >> any primary target. With proper notification to everyone involved, >> obviously. > > I agree. > > At the summit in October there was a discussion about this. I was on > the side of fast rollback for new failures. Would anybody care to > present the opposite view with regard to a patch like this? Can we > agree on fast rollback for bootstrap failures on x86/x86_64 GNU/Linux > systems?
And we disagreed. The course of action is to simply ask the offender to revert his patches for now. It has worked reliably in the past, but I can't see any such suggestion in this particular case (on the mailing-list). Richard. > Ian >
