On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > On 03/28/2011 02:27 PM, Michael Matz wrote: >>>> >>>> <mem_ref 0x7ffff7ff9118 >>>> type<record_type 0x7ffff5b295e8 GENOME_LOC_TYPE_2 packed type_0 BLK >>>> size<integer_cst 0x7ffff5b256b8 constant 48> >>>> unit size<integer_cst 0x7ffff5b25708 constant 6> >>>> align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7ffff5b29540 >>>> >>>> which looks ok to me. >>> >>> It already isn't, why is the alignment 8 if __alignof__ >>> (GENOME_LOC_TYPE_2) is 1? >> >> The aligns are printed in bits. It really is okay, as is the MEM. > > Uff, I'm always confused by align being printed after the unit size. > >> As some digging shows, already GCC 1.35 had effectively the same code. >> As soon as parameters are passed in registers GCC loads the parts fitting >> into registers as full words. We could simply sorry() for these cases, as >> they never worked correctly. Though I suppose that's quite unforgiving, >> as most of the time (struct in question not passing page border) it works >> fine. > > We should warn, I think.
We should fix the bug ;) Richard. > Paolo >
