DJ Delorie <d...@redhat.com> writes: >> Couldn't GCC (and binutils) on djgpp set >> _CRT0_FLAG_DISALLOW_RESPONSE_FILES so that GCC's routines get used >> to expand the response files instead of the runtime's routines? > > I suppose it could. I'm not sure how much confusion that would cause > (probably little if any), but as long as djgpp users don't break if > they *don't* use comments, I don't see the harm in it.
Is it really worth worrying about this? Are comments in response files really of much value? Ian
