On 8 February 2011 09:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 6 February 2011 23:57, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>>>> And wouldn't it be appropriate to remove doc/xml/gnu/fdl-1.2.xml now
>>>>>> that you have added fdl-1.3.xml?
>>>>> Possibly. We still have gpl-2.0.xml there, which doesn't seem to be
>>>>> included. I followed that example.
>>>>
>>>> If you are not using GPL 2.0 nor FDL 1.2 anymore in libstdc++ (and we
>>>> should not be using these two anymore in all of GCC), we should remove
>>>> them. Would you mind doing that or should I give it a try?
>>> I can do that, assuming no objections from the other maintainers.
>>
>> Hmm, I see that these two are still in there. We should not be
>> using them anymore. Would you mind removing them, or do you see
>> a problem?
>>
>> (It would be good to make the same change for GCC 4.5 as well.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gerald
>
> Done for trunk, r169915, like so:
>
> 2011-02-08 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
>
> * doc/xml/gnu/fdl-1.2.xml: Remove.
> * doc/xml/gnu/gpl-2.0.xml: Remove.
> * doc/Makefile.am: Update.
> * doc/Makefile.in: Regnerate.
>
> Tested with 'make doc-html'
>
> I'll do the same for the 4.5 branch later today.
In rev 169944 I've now removed gpl-2.0.xml from the 4.5 branch (we
only have fdl-1.2 there, not 1.3, so I left that)
011-02-08 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com>
* doc/xml/gnu/gpl-2.0.xml: Remove.
* doc/Makefile.am: Update.
* doc/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
I've also fixed the "Regnerate" typo in my previous ChangeLog entry.
