On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 11:27 PM, FX <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote: >> GCC maintainers is this OK for your policy? > > Personally, I don't think it's a good thing to do: a secondary platform that > only supports the latest released version of said platform does not indicate > high stability. But it's up to the cygwin maintainers to decide, of course. > > However, the fact should be documented on the installation notes > (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#x-x-cygwin) and probably on the > release notes as well, with something like "The GCC 4.6 series requires > Cygwin x.y.z or later".
Indeed. Maybe also document a workaround (if possible), like "download fenv.h from this link and put it there". Richard. > FX >
