-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/11 11:51, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On 02/07/2011 09:32 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 02/02/11 07:19, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In the past few days, something has regressed >>>> on the sparc. Revision 169143 only had 699 failures >>>> and ~100 of those were LTO related. David Korn's >>>> patch seems to have resolved those. Revision 169504 >>>> has 2231 failures. > Were you able to test whether or not the ira-costs.c patch was the cause > of these problems? It's been problematical elsewhere and it wouldn't > take much more than a nudge to for me to pull it given its ability to > uncover latent problems. > >> This is for revision 169231. So it looks like that caused >> the failures. OK. I'm going to take a looksie. As long as it isn't something I've already fixed or some dumb bug elsewhere, the plan is to pull the ira-costs patch and revisit it in stage1.
jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNUEv/AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7WPQH+QGJOYGd3xLGqj0tx7ObT2GZ 7xvwUc8xHdKhnp/ltLyl2mb4SUmnhD0OQ5UXEQPD6jtDJmS3Xh2RO/LnmD0vo9Nb TwvPvgq4ilR67hY2SvDAaHqHnclV4BAfVjhIKdRM3AZxO+a+ufTGJtTm7VZ8AiHO 531EDvrr7KCKTZRQqj2zqZWo/bO/Z1RjbX0BNV0B641OwP5Ng5md1XnGaNSPI3wq 4oSLfhFcm4YFYlxOqrmtJkHZHHOADNmpRHIRUbg/qC8quLr48v56wk4Bmn60x3/B w0ldVZJqGg5Y0tyvpAdgYAzsNI7cQledwRJyLC1wiQWs2JzIztaGN6VkIWxo/HU= =iM9P -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
