On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 11:51:55AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:35 AM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote: > > So, in c-common.c we have: > > > > targetm.init_builtins (); > > build_common_builtin_nodes (); > > > > and in f95-1.c we have: > > > > build_common_builtin_nodes (); > > targetm.init_builtins (); > > They are "unordered", thus, targetm.init_builtins is supposed to initialize > target specific builtins only. > > > I would like to change c-common.c to match fortran, so that the target hook > > can slightly alter (rename) the linkage name of some of the common builtin > > nodes. If that answer is no, what's the best way to get __divdc3 renamed? > > I would say add a new hook that can be called from build_common_builtin_nodes > instead.
Richard, The workaround that Mike came up with for darwin is posted here... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-02/msg00726.html FYI, I tried inverting the order of targetm.init_builtins (); and build_common_builtin_nodes (); in c-common.c to match that in f95-1.c but it broke the bootstrap. Jack > > Richard.
