On 01/02/2011 17:15, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/02/2011 02:33, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> There are ~100 failures on each *-rtems* target
>>> in the latest test runs when various lto related
>>> flags are on. The symbols in questions are in the
>>> RTEMS libraries which are picked up via the
>>> -B... argument. Other symbols from the same
>>> library are resolved.
>> These have all cropped up since -fuse-linker-plugin became the default.
>>
>>> Should LTO work with a target not using gold?
>> Yes, it should, but some work is needed at the binutils end. I am testing
>> the attached two patches at the moment; the idea is to have fully-debugged
>> support for LTO+plugin in the 2.20.1 release, to support 4.6.0 when it comes
>> out.
>>
>
> FWIW, your recan linker patch doesn't fix LTO 8, which is:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
It wasn't supposed to, we've been through this before. It needs both the
link-order fix *and* the rescan-libs fix. The combined pair of patches I sent
Joel (one of which is indeed that first patch, the second of which is for lib
rescanning) *does* fix LTO 8 on i686/Linux, I tested it.
cheers,
DaveK
