* Gabriel Dos Reis:

>>> Still, it's certainly an improvement on the current
>>> situation and the cost is negligible compared to the call to the
>>> allocator.  Since it's a security issue, some form of the patch should
>>> go in.
>>
>> Well, should I resubmit, with the fix for the problem building
>> size_t(-1)?
>
> I think that would help.

I got it to work, finally:

  <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01593.html>

I hope it helps fixing this issue for good.

Reply via email to