Hello,

>
> @@ -162,6 +175,7 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
>      return 0;
>
>    if ((XEXP (condition, 0) == reg)
> +      || (REGNO (XEXP (condition, 0)) == CC_REGNUM)
>        || (GET_CODE (XEXP (condition, 0)) == PLUS
>                    && XEXP (XEXP (condition, 0), 0) == reg))
>
> You can't depend on CC_REGNUM in generic code.  That's part of the
> private machine description for ARM.  Other cores have different ways of
> representing condition codes.
>
> R.

Yes, thanks, I found that out when testing the patch on PowerPC.
Attached is a newer version of the patch which is currently
under testing.

Thanks,
Revital


(See attached file: patch_arm_doloop_5.txt)
Index: modulo-sched.c
===================================================================
--- modulo-sched.c      (revision 168397)
+++ modulo-sched.c      (working copy)
@@ -1021,7 +1021,8 @@ sms_schedule (void)
         if (CALL_P (insn)
             || BARRIER_P (insn)
             || (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn) && !JUMP_P (insn)
-                && !single_set (insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != USE)
+                && !single_set (insn) && GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) != USE
+                && !reg_mentioned_p (count_reg, insn))
             || (FIND_REG_INC_NOTE (insn, NULL_RTX) != 0)
             || (INSN_P (insn) && (set = single_set (insn))
                 && GET_CODE (SET_DEST (set)) == SUBREG))
Index: loop-doloop.c
===================================================================
--- loop-doloop.c       (revision 168397)
+++ loop-doloop.c       (working copy)
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
   rtx inc_src;
   rtx condition;
   rtx pattern;
+  rtx cc_reg = NULL_RTX;
+  rtx reg_orig;
 
   /* The canonical doloop pattern we expect has one of the following
      forms:
@@ -96,7 +98,16 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
      2)  (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1))
          (set (pc) (if_then_else (reg != 0)
                                 (label_ref (label))
-                                (pc))).  */
+                                (pc))).  
+
+     Some targets (ARM) do the comparison before the branch, as in the
+     folloring form:
+
+     3) (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1), 0)))
+                   (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))])
+        (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc)
+                                (label_ref (label))
+                                (pc))) */
 
   pattern = PATTERN (doloop_pat);
 
@@ -104,14 +115,42 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
     {
       rtx cond;
       rtx prev_insn = prev_nondebug_insn (doloop_pat);
+      rtx src_orig;
+      rtx cmp_orig;
 
-      /* We expect the decrement to immediately precede the branch.  */
+      /* In case the pattern is not PARALLEL we expect two forms
+        of doloop which are cases 2) and 3) above: in case 2) the
+        decrement is immediately precedes the branch. while in case
+        3) the compre and decrement instructions immediately precede
+        the branch.  */
 
       if (prev_insn == NULL_RTX || !INSN_P (prev_insn))
         return 0;
 
       cmp = pattern;
-      inc = PATTERN (PREV_INSN (doloop_pat));
+      if (GET_CODE (PATTERN (prev_insn)) == PARALLEL)
+        {
+         /* The third case: the compre and decrement instructions
+            immediately precede the branch.  */
+         cmp_orig = XVECEXP (PATTERN (prev_insn), 0, 0);
+         if (GET_CODE (cmp_orig) != SET)
+           return 0;
+         if (GET_CODE (SET_SRC (cmp_orig)) != COMPARE)
+           return 0;
+         src_orig = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp_orig), 0);
+         if (XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp_orig), 1) != const0_rtx 
+             || GET_CODE (src_orig) != PLUS)
+           return 0;
+         reg_orig = XEXP (src_orig, 0);
+         if (XEXP (src_orig, 1) != GEN_INT (-1) 
+             || !REG_P (reg_orig))
+           return 0;
+         cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp_orig);
+         
+         inc = XVECEXP (PATTERN (prev_insn), 0, 1);
+       }
+      else
+        inc = PATTERN (PREV_INSN (doloop_pat));
       /* We expect the condition to be of the form (reg != 0)  */
       cond = XEXP (SET_SRC (cmp), 0);
       if (GET_CODE (cond) != NE || XEXP (cond, 1) != const0_rtx)
@@ -162,6 +201,9 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
     return 0;
 
   if ((XEXP (condition, 0) == reg)
+      || ((cc_reg != NULL_RTX)
+         && (XEXP (condition, 0) == cc_reg)
+         && (reg_orig == reg))
       || (GET_CODE (XEXP (condition, 0)) == PLUS
                   && XEXP (XEXP (condition, 0), 0) == reg))
    {
@@ -181,7 +223,24 @@ doloop_condition_get (rtx doloop_pat)
                      (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
                      (additional clobbers and uses)])
 
-         So we return that form instead.
+        For the third form we expect:
+
+        (parallel [(set (cc) (compare ((plus (reg) (const_int -1)), 0))
+                   (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))])
+        (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc)
+                                (label_ref (label))
+                                (pc))) 
+
+        which is equivalent to the following:
+
+        (parallel [(set (cc) (compare (reg,  1))
+                   (set (reg) (plus (reg) (const_int -1)))
+                   (set (pc) (if_then_else (NE == cc)
+                                           (label_ref (label))
+                                           (pc))))])
+
+        So we return the second form instead for the two cases.
+
      */
         condition = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (NE, VOIDmode, inc_src, const1_rtx);
 
Index: config/arm/thumb2.md
===================================================================
--- config/arm/thumb2.md        (revision 168424)
+++ config/arm/thumb2.md        (working copy)
@@ -836,7 +836,7 @@
   "operands[4] = GEN_INT (- INTVAL (operands[2]));"
 )
 
-(define_insn "*thumb2_addsi3_compare0"
+(define_insn "thumb2_addsi3_compare0"
   [(set (reg:CC_NOOV CC_REGNUM)
        (compare:CC_NOOV
          (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "l,  0, r")
@@ -1118,3 +1118,53 @@
   "
   operands[2] = GEN_INT (32 - INTVAL (operands[2]));
   ")
+
+ ;; Define the subtract-one-and-jump insns so loop.c
+ ;; knows what to generate.
+ (define_expand "doloop_end"
+   [(use (match_operand 0 "" ""))      ; loop pseudo
+    (use (match_operand 1 "" ""))      ; iterations; zero if unknown
+    (use (match_operand 2 "" ""))      ; max iterations
+    (use (match_operand 3 "" ""))      ; loop level
+    (use (match_operand 4 "" ""))]     ; label
+   "TARGET_THUMB2"
+   "
+ {
+   /* Currently SMS relies on the do-loop pattern to recognize loops
+      where (1) the control part comprises of all insns defining and/or
+      using a certain 'count' register and (2) the loop count can be
+      adjusted by modifying this register prior to the loop.
+      ??? The possible introduction of a new block to initialize the
+      new IV can potentially effects branch optimizations.  */
+   if (optimize > 0 && flag_modulo_sched)
+   {
+     rtx s0;
+     rtx bcomp;
+     rtx loc_ref;
+     rtx cc_reg;
+     rtx insn;
+     rtx cmp;
+
+     /* Only use this on innermost loops.  */
+     if (INTVAL (operands[3]) > 1)
+       FAIL;
+     if (GET_MODE (operands[0]) != SImode)
+       FAIL;
+
+     s0 = operands [0];
+     insn = emit_insn (gen_thumb2_addsi3_compare0 (s0, s0, GEN_INT (-1)));
+     cmp = XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0);
+     cc_reg = SET_DEST (cmp);
+     bcomp = gen_rtx_NE(VOIDmode, cc_reg, const0_rtx); 
+     loc_ref = gen_rtx_LABEL_REF (VOIDmode, operands [4]);
+     emit_jump_insn (gen_rtx_SET (VOIDmode, pc_rtx,
+                                  gen_rtx_IF_THEN_ELSE (VOIDmode, bcomp,
+                                                        loc_ref, pc_rtx)));
+
+     DONE;
+   }else
+      FAIL;
+ }")
+
+
+

Reply via email to