> As someone who encountered slim LTO on Unix 17 years ago (on MIPS) I can > promise you that unless fat LTO is supported, there will never be a
Fat LTO is just too slow. I suspect with that kind of performance penalty most people simply would not use it at all. > successful transition. The amount of work to deal with the make > environment every time simply made it not worth it. It's not too hard in my experience. I did it in a few cases for gcc. The gcc maintainers unfortunately didn't want to integrate the wrapper scripts to make it easy, but they can be always downloaded separately and I assume distributions will eventually ship them anyways. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.