On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/12/2010 17:44, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Well, I reckon this patch is great (but don't have the approval rights). >>> It's passed an lto-bootstrap of gcc on i686-pc-cygwin and the tests are well >>> underway without anything abnormal showing up. >>> >> >> Can we close >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 >> >> as invalid > > It's not invalid; GOLD linking with -static (explicit or implicit) would > still have problems without the pass through. >
Personally, I think 2 stage linking is one way to fix this issue. -- H.J.
