> I don't understand what makes you say this. Partial conversions have > much lower chance of breaking things when the macro is set up in > complicated ways, and you also trivially avoid performance regressions at > non-converted call site.
But what's the point in doing this during stage3? This will give no benefits to the users and may introduce new bugs; we already have enough of them and we should concentrate on fixing them. IMO this is stage1 material only. -- Eric Botcazou
