On 30 November 2010 22:51, Roman Kononov wrote: > The two programs below differ by the location of =default applied to > the move constructor. In the first program, it is defaulted inside > the class during declaration. In the second program, it is defaulted > outside the class in the definition. > > The first program does not compile. The second does compile. Is it a > bug or am I misuse gcc?
Such questions are off-topic on this mailing list which is for development of gcc, please take questions about using gcc to the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org list, or if you think you've found a bug report it to bugzilla. If it's a bug, discussing how to fix it would be appropriate on this list, but "is this a bug" questions are not.
