I found an error in my size experiment set up -- (libstdc++ shared vs non shared) -- please discard the size numbers -- will remeasure.
Thanks, David On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: > Hi, > and for size, could you please also do -Os comparsions? I am aware that -O2 > inliner is tuned somewhat up at C++. This is given by fact that we do have > C++ > benchmark suite we use to monitor inlining. > http://gcc.opensuse.org/c++bench-frescobaldi/ > > Programs there are a lot more aggressive on abstraction than whatever SPEC2k > and SPEC2k6 does. I know I can tune the inliner down for SPEC but get > regression there... But given we can get 10% difference on normal C++ program > it might be interesting to consider some compromise, at least for -O2. > > Honza >
