Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes: > Quoting Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com>: > >> Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes: >> >>> Before I go and make all these target changes & test them, is there at >>> least agreemwent that this is the right approach, i.e replacing >>> CUMULATIVE_ARG * >>> with void *, and splitting up x_rtl into two variables. >> >> I don't know how we want to get there, but it seems to me that the place >> we want to end up is with the target hooks defined to take an argument >> of type struct cumulative_args * (or a better name if we can think of >> one). > > Actually, this doesn't work, because then different target vectors have > different types. You might get away with it now, but LTO on a multi-target > compiler would fail.
Good point. > I think we should just > typedef void *cumulative_args_t; > > and use that for our hooks. Another area where we can do something much nicer when we move to C++. Ian
