On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:57, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I think that splitting things all the way down to $arch is probably > not useful in that things that affect all backends will not get > addressed promptly if backend reviewers are so narrowly focused. Agreed. A backend specific list may work, but I don't think it would be useful to make it too specific. I'm not too sanguine about the whole idea, though. Perhaps encourage the use of [prefix] tags like we do for branches and large modules? I would rather use tagging than a fixed taxonomy. It's more flexible and easier to change if our needs change. Diego.
