On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 03:29:20PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:51:09PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > So, attached and untested.
> >
> > Uros.
>
> I tested your patch on x86_64-*-freebsd. My ppl and cloog
> libraries were built with FreeBSD's system gcc (4.2.1). All
> tests failed due to missing symbols that are marked GCC_3.0.
>
> > Index: gcc/config/i386/t-freebsd
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gcc/config/i386/t-freebsd (revision 0)
> > +++ gcc/config/i386/t-freebsd (revision 0)
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +SHLIB_MAPFILES = $(srcdir)/config/i386/libgcc-bsd.ver
>
> Changing the = to += seems to fix the problem. My
> regression testing is still running, so I can't
> report stats.
>
With my change to +=, on x86_64-*-freebsd I get
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 72950
# of unexpected failures 74
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 215
# of unresolved testcases 3
# of unsupported tests 1081
/usr/home/sgk/gcc/obj4x/gcc/xgcc version 4.6.0 20100830 (experimental) (GCC)
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes 36155
# of unexpected failures 4
# of unexpected successes 7
# of expected failures 59
# of unsupported tests 53
/usr/home/sgk/gcc/obj4x/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran version 4.6.0
20100830 (experimental) (GCC)
I quickly looked through the gcc.log file and noticed
a couple of ICE's but I believe those are unrelated to
the TFmode patch.
Note, I believe that I do not have the authority to
approve this patch.
--
Steve
