Basile Starynkevitch <bas...@starynkevitch.net> writes:

> My impression is that s->u.s.line.file usually happens to have the same
> offset (at least on GNU/Linux/AMD64=x86_64) as
> s->u.param_struct.param[0] and that for every type concerned by
> output_type_enum  its param[0] subfield happens to be non-null. This
> explains that it worked by accident.

No, that is not the case.  But I already explained why this error
doesn't matter:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00396.html

> By the way, what is the good way to find out exactly what svn commit
> introduced the bogus line?

svn blame

Ian

Reply via email to