Basile Starynkevitch <bas...@starynkevitch.net> writes: > My impression is that s->u.s.line.file usually happens to have the same > offset (at least on GNU/Linux/AMD64=x86_64) as > s->u.param_struct.param[0] and that for every type concerned by > output_type_enum its param[0] subfield happens to be non-null. This > explains that it worked by accident.
No, that is not the case. But I already explained why this error doesn't matter: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-08/msg00396.html > By the way, what is the good way to find out exactly what svn commit > introduced the bogus line? svn blame Ian