Mark Mitchell <m...@codesourcery.com> writes: > I believe that the only real fix here is (a) for the FSF to abandon the > GFDL, and relicense manuals under the GPL, or (b) for the FSF to add an > exception to the GFDL, making it compatible with the GPL in some way. > However, I have no evidence that the FSF is considering either of these > ideas; RMS didn't provide encouraging feedback when I made such suggestions.
What if we ask the FSF if we can dual license the constraints.md files under both the GPL and the GFDL? Ian
