"Alfred M. Szmidt" <a...@gnu.org> writes: > It should be noted that Debian considers the GFDL a non-free > /software/ license; which it is, but then the GFDL is not a software > license to begin with.
The official Debian position is that the distinction between a software license and a non-software license for the sort of material distributed in Debian is an artificial and meaningless distinction because of, among other reasons, exactly the use case being discussed in this thread. -- Russ Allbery (r...@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
