On 07/10/2010 10:01 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010, Steven Bosscher wrote:
Well, let me add one short comment then. I'd say hppa2-hpux is still
much more relevant than ia64-hpux -- at least, everywhere I'm looking
i.e. workstations. It may be different in the server market.
Anyway, when I look at posted gcc-testresults of this month, there are
*zero* postings of testresults for ia64-hpux, and daily results (more,
in fact) for hppa2-hpux.
can we keep hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 as a secondary target for at least
one more release, and not add ia64-hpux?
I find your line of reasoning very convincing. :-)
The reason for ia64-hpux was that it exercises some unique code paths
due to addp4, but Steven's reasoning is also convincing...
Paolo
