On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-09/msg00501.html: >>> It was also suggested to change hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 >>> to ia64-hpux and to change s390-linux-gnu to s390x-linux-gnu in the >>> list of secondary targets. >> Shall we proceed? > > I'd say "Yes", and I did not see any comments to the contrary, either.
Well, let me add one short comment then. I'd say hppa2-hpux is still much more relevant than ia64-hpux -- at least, everywhere I'm looking i.e. workstations. It may be different in the server market. Anyway, when I look at posted gcc-testresults of this month, there are *zero* postings of testresults for ia64-hpux, and daily results (more, in fact) for hppa2-hpux. can we keep hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 as a secondary target for at least one more release, and not add ia64-hpux? Ciao! Steven
