On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Tom Tromey <tro...@redhat.com> wrote: > Ian> In Tom's interesting idea, we would write the mark function by hand for > Ian> each C++ type that we use GTY with. > > I think we should be clear that the need to write a mark function for a > new type is a drawback of this approach. Perhaps gengtype could still > write the functions for ordinary types in GCC, just not (templatized) > containers.
I don't think that's a too bad drawback. > Also, perhaps we actually need 2 such functions, one for the GC and one > for PCH. I don't remember. Finally a reason to let PCH die ;) Richard. > Tom >
