Richard Kenner wrote: >> However, if I changed the code, but did not regenerate the docs, and you >> then picked up my changes, possibly made more of your own, and then >> regenerated the docs, *you* would be in breach. (Because my changes are >> only available to you under the GPL; you do not have the right to >> relicense my changes under the GFDL.) > > Just to be clear, I don't believe that regenerating the docs itself would > be a breach since NOTHING you do internally can be a GPL or GFDL breach). > What would be a breach would be *distributing* those regenerated docs.
Indeed; I was too casual in my description. Dave can regenerate the docs, and even pass them around his company, but he can't distribute them. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
