On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> For example: >> A textual GIMPLE tuple for the statement a=b+c can be like >> <GIMPLE_ASSIGN<PLUS_EXPR,a,b,c>> (As demonstrated by the internal >> manual also). >> Is such a representation easy to parse? > > S-expressions are easier to parse and more compact, and are consistent > with gcc's back end. Also, there are editors that already know how to > edit and indent S-expressions. Thanks Andrew . Any thoughts on the 3rd point? > > Andrew. > -- Cheers Sandy
