DJ Delorie wrote: >> Yes, but presumably you could make those pseudo-ops ARM-specific, >> rather than EABI specific? > > Could, but gcc doesn't always know the specific .fpu. I imagine > version-sync nightmares too, so IMHO we should either do a > command-line thing from gcc, or just forget it if EABI works.
DJ, I don't have intimate knowledge of these bits, but I don't see how GCC's knowledge of FPU is, or should be, EABI-specific. I think you should start by looking at the EABI behavior, and seeing if you think it's problematic. If it isn't, then you can either punt on arm-elf, or enable some EABI functionality there. If, on the other hand, you think there's a problem when using the EABI, then we should talk about how to solve it. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery m...@codesourcery.com (650) 331-3385 x713
