>> > Not yet, I mistakenly thought -fwhole-program is the same as -fwhopr >> > and it is just for solving scaling issue of large program.(These two >> > options do look similar :-). I shall try next. >> >> Yep, -fwhopr is not ideal name, but I guess there is not much >> to do about it.
It is marked as experimental, so if it is going to stay for GCC 4.6, then we should change the name. I think one possibility discussed somewhere is that LTO scales back automatically, so the option would be not necessary. Cheers, Manuel.
