On Apr 25, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >>>> >>>> On what do you base these assertions? Every point seems wrong to me. >>> >>> Quoting from the link: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html >> >> The key distinction is that contributing to LLVM does not require you to >> sign a form (which isn't even publicly available) and mail it in to a busy >> and high-latency organization before non-trivial patches will be accepted. > > So, is the copyright disclaimer implicit in the patch submission? Who > defines the conditions?
That web page is everything that there is. I am aware that this is not as legally air-tight as the FSF disclaimer, but empirically many companies seem to have no problem with it. -Chris
