On 22/04/2010 17:50, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> 
> Hi, Is there really a need for an angry reply like this?  Is it better
> to just give some advises instead?

  Ok, here is a non-angry reply to the angry post by tbp:

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/smoke_and_mirrors

> Noun
> 
> smoke and mirrors
> 
>    1. (idiomatic) A deceptive, fraudulent, or unconvincing explanation or 
> description.


  Dear tbp, please don't accuse people of being deceptive or fraudulent, it is
not a nice thing to do.

    cheers,
      DaveK


Reply via email to