On 04/12/2010 05:27 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> Hello,
> One of our engineers requested a feature so that
> compiler can avoid to re-load variables after a function
> call if it is known not to write to memory. It should 
> slash considerable code size in our applications. I found
> the existing "pure" and "const" cannot meet his requirements
> because the function is optimized out if it doesn't return
> a value.

If a function doesn't write to memory and it doesn't return a
value, what is the point of calling it?

Andrew.

Reply via email to