On 04/12/2010 05:27 PM, Bingfeng Mei wrote: > Hello, > One of our engineers requested a feature so that > compiler can avoid to re-load variables after a function > call if it is known not to write to memory. It should > slash considerable code size in our applications. I found > the existing "pure" and "const" cannot meet his requirements > because the function is optimized out if it doesn't return > a value.
If a function doesn't write to memory and it doesn't return a value, what is the point of calling it? Andrew.
