On 4/8/10 14:30 , Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> On 4/8/10 14:10 , Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> >>>> So I think tying WHOPR and profile feedback too close together is a >>>> mistake. >>> >>> Sorry, I didn't mean that. My intent is to make whopr/lto use profiling >>> information if it is available. Much like we do with other optimization >>> decisions. They transparently become more precise in the presence of >>> profiling information. >> >> Both LTO and WHOPR now works with profiling pretty well (and I've switched > ^^^^^ too much of market speach. WHOPR is not working well, > profile feedback or not ;)
Ah! I was going to say :) For WHOPR, the partitioning should be driven by profile info (if available). First, it should Just Work, of course. Diego.