On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > This code is sort of weird, though; why the conversion from DImode to > DFmode?
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg00245.html> for discussion of the e500 subregs and their semantics. I made them work reliably (for 4.3 and later, 4.4 and later when decimal floating-point modes are involved) - but not necessarily efficiently in all cases. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
