On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Joseph S. Myers
<jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
>
>> I have 16 BITS_PER_UNIT for this target, with 1 UNITS_PER_WORD. If I
>> define FLOAT_TYPE_SIZE to be 32, then a float is an HFmode and it's
>> not that gcc uses this.
>> Defining BITS_PER_UNIT to 16 shouldn't generate problems inside the
>> compiler given that GCC has generic treatment for these situations
>
> The GCC support for BITS_PER_UNIT values other than 8 is extremely
> bitrotten and parts of it have never worked; there are no such targets in
> the GCC source tree, no patches are tested for such targets and it is easy
> to have hidden dependencies on 8-bit bytes.  It is very inadvisable to
> make your first port one to such an unusual target; substantially more GCC
> experience and expertise is needed for doing a port to a system different
> from all supported systems and that challenges hidden assumptions in the
> GCC code.  There will be a large amount of work finding and fixing issues
> related to non-8-bit bytes that will need doing before you have a working
> integer port, and all that should be done before you look at
> floating-point issues.
>
> If seriously interested in fixing support for non-8-bit bytes, first
> understand exactly what the C semantics are for such systems (including
> how strings are meant to work).  Then read my various past messages to the
> GCC lists discussing aspects of support for such systems in GCC (which you
> should be able to find for yourself in the list archives).  Improving wide
> string support for normal 8-bit-byte systems (so that optimization etc.
> infrastructure can work with both wide and narrow strings) may be a useful
> starting point for making some things work when the characters in narrow
> strings are more than one host byte.

Thank you for all the discussion regarding the GCC support to 16bit
targets. I had noticed already issues with wide-char strings which was
another pending subject. :)
I will be careful with gcc in this respect and make sure I start
fixing issues regarding 'unusual' 16bit targets.


-- 
PMatos

Reply via email to