Joern Rennecke <amyl...@spamcop.net> writes: > Quoting Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com>: > >> I'm not surprised that plugins don't work > > For Milepost we need both the --enable-build-with-cxx configure option > and plugins. > How is this supposed to work? > Should the person compiling the plugins use C++ to compile the plugin? > Or should the cc1 / cc1plus dso export unambiguous symbols with C linkage > names in addition to the C++ linkage names? > Or should we have a language extension to specify C++ linkage in C headers, > and arrange for the gcc headers that are installed for teh benefit of plugins > to reflect the used build/bootstrap language so that either gcc or g++ will > just work, using references with the appropriate names?
I was imagining that if gcc is built with C++, then plugins would be built with C++. Ian
