On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Paulo J. Matos <pocma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Richard Guenther > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yes. During expansion we destroy the trees. >> > > Is there a way to avoid tree destruction? Maybe through a flag? > If not, what I need is in the hook, to know if the caller, calls any > other functions besides the one we are evaluating the sibcall to. This > would be easy with the tree as we would only need to walk the tree and > find CALL_EXPR different from the one we get in the argument for the > hook. Without the tree, I don't even know if this is possible since we > don't have the complete RTL yet, right? Do you have any suggestion?
Look at cgraph_node (cfun->decl)->callers Richard. >> Richard. >> > > > > -- > Paulo Jorge Matos - pocmatos at gmail.com > http://www.pmatos.net >
