Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
>>> Are rpaths as portable as shared libraries or do we support a host
>>> architecture that has shared libraries but no equivalent to rpath?
>> Windows (mingw) comes to mind at least.
>
> If the hypothetical libiberty.dll were only used by cc1 etc. (not by the
> driver), putting it in the same directory as cc1, libexecsubdir, where
> Windows would expect to find it, should work to allow separate copies for
> each GCC install. Though I prefer the --whole-archive approach (with a
> fallback of adding references to libiberty symbols or extracting the .o
> files if we wish to support plugins on hosts without --whole-archive or
> equivalent).
Has anyone tested plugins on windows yet? (I haven't, but I'll find some
time to give it a bit of basic testing during stage 4.)
cheers,
DaveK
