Hello.

I'm now doing regular builds/tests from SVN of GCC, G++ and GNAT on
FreeBSD x86_64 and publishing the build logs at:

  http://gcc.coreland.ath.cx

I hope to produce builds weekly. Unfortunately I can't publish the
actual binaries due to space/bandwidth restrictions.

While there aren't *too* many test failures currently, there appears to
be a problem with the test suite in that it returns a 'failure' exit
code when the test ends and I'm not sure if this is expected behaviour
or not.

Highlights of the first build (SVN r154276):

                === acats Summary ===
# of expected passes            2290
# of unexpected failures        31
*** FAILURES: c52103x c52104x c52104y c761007 c85005c c85006c c910002 c93004b 
c93004c c93004d c93005a c93005b c94001c c94002b c94002e c94002f c94002g c94007a 
c94007b c94008c c94008d c94020a c95040c c97203c c97303c c9a007a c9a009c c9a009g 
cb1010a cb1010c cb1010d 

                === g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            20986
# of unexpected failures        4
# of expected failures          150
# of unsupported tests          286
/gnat/obj/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++  version 4.5.0 20091118 (experimental) 
(GCC) 

                === gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes            57515
# of unexpected failures        42
# of unexpected successes       4
# of expected failures          169
# of unsupported tests          1511
/gnat/obj/gcc/xgcc  version 4.5.0 20091118 (experimental) (GCC) 

                === gnat Summary ===

# of expected passes            739
# of unexpected failures        4
# of expected failures          5

                === libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes            1001
# of unexpected failures        2
# of unsupported tests          2

                === libmudflap Summary ===

# of expected passes            1884
# of unexpected failures        10

                === libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes            6337
# of unexpected failures        2
# of expected failures          89
# of unsupported tests          389

Regards,
M

Reply via email to