Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > OK, to me that seems like an excellent reason to implement a special > case for the warning here. For example, perhaps if a struct has only > one field, and that field is an aggregate, then we don't warn if there > is only one set of braces. > Sure, we considered that, you can find traces of that reasoning in the audit trail, then lately I noticed the ICC and SunStudio behaviors, and that idea appeared to me a tad too sophisticated... but if people agree, I can return to it. Do you think that version of the warning should be simply the default, right, simply the new behavior of -Wmissing-braces?
Paolo.
