> I suppose the idea is to emit each used macro a single time only, the > code seems to confirm this.
Makes sense indeed (and at least matches what the code does). > Arnaud> so would the addition of a new callback (e.g. > Arnaud> void (*used) (cpp_reader *, unsigned int, cpp_hashnode *); > Arnaud> ) be acceptable in principle? If so, I'll post a formal patch on > Arnaud> gcc-patches@ > > Yes, this would be fine. Thanks, I'll prepare such patch then. Arno
