2009/10/30 Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com>:
> Mohamed Shafi <shafi...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>From ice4.c.168r.asmcons
>>
>> (insn 5 2 6 2 ice4.c:4 (set (reg:SI 61 [ s ])
>> (mem/c/i:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("s") [flags 0x2] <var_decl
>> 0xb7bfd000 s>) [0 s+0 S4 A32])) 2 {*movsi_internal} (nil))
>>
>> (insn 6 5 7 2 ice4.c:4 (set (reg:QI 62)
>> (plus:QI (subreg:QI (reg:SI 61 [ s ]) 0)
>> (const_int -100 [0xffffff9c]))) 16 {addqi3}
>> (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 61 [ s ])
>> (nil)))
>>
>> How can i prevent this ICE ?
>
> If asmcons is the first place that this appears, then I think it must
> be coming from some asm statement. So the first step would be to look
> at the asm statement and see if it can be rewritten using a different
> constraint.
>
No this appears from the rtl expand onwards.
Shafi
