Matthias Klose wrote: > On 19.10.2009 19:42, Andrew Haley wrote: >> Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> Andrew Haley<a...@redhat.com> writes: >>> >>>> Matthias Klose wrote: >>>>> --enable-plugin is used by classpath (part of libjava) and now by GCC >>>>> itself. disabling the build of the gcjwebplugin now disables plugin >>>>> support in GCC as well. Please could the option for enabling GCC >>>>> plugin >>>>> support be renamed to something like --enable-plugins, >>>>> --enable-gcc-plugin, --enable-gcc-plugins ? The only reason for not >>>>> renaming the existing libjava option is that it was there first, and >>>>> that it is part of an imported tree. >>>> That doesn't seem like a good enough reason to me. We should rename >>>> the libjava option --enable-web-plugin or --enable-browser-plugin . >>> >>> We could rename in the top leve configure/Makefile if we don't want to >>> touch the classpath sources. >> >> That sounds like a nice solution. > > it's not necessary to do this at toplevel, changing libjava is ok. > tested with --enable-plugin --disable-browser-plugin, and > --disable-plugin and --enable-browser-plugin. > > Ok for the trunk?
Looks like a good solution. Andrew.
