On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 10/12/2009 05:17 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> >> That seems like a huge bug in git-svn because we already use multiple >> directory levels under branches. Hint ibm and redhat and debain. > > Yep, that's why I said "expand". I've thought about fixing that aspect of > git-svn, but I'm not sure how it would tell the difference between a branch > directory and a directory of branches given that SVN basically models a > filesystem. >
Branches always start with a copy of a directory somewhere else, at least in the gcc repo. Further, at least in the gcc repo, all branches start with a copy of a directory from branches or from trunk. So, it's fairly easy to detect branches. > Jason >
